Hailemariam Desalegn
Necessary Illusions: Understanding Desalegn’s
Recent Comments
Ray Ja Fraser
Recently, Ethiopian Prime Minister
Hailemariam Desalegn warned that Ethiopia will “be forced to take…appropriate
action to quell [Eritrea’s] destabilization efforts.” The comments parallel
those he made in an interview conducted last year, warning that Ethiopia has
shifted its policy towards Eritrea and is now determined to unseat Eritrean
President Isaias Afwerki by force. While the respective statements are serious
– in that they precipitously challenge, if not flagrantly violate, accepted
international norms, laws, and diplomatic protocols – they do not constitute
“breaking developments” per se. For example, prior to his passing, the late
Meles Zenawi had similarly changed Ethiopia’s policy toward Eritrea from one
based on “no-war-no-peace” to the active pursuit of “regime change” in Asmara. Generally, Ethiopian saber rattling has often
sought to deflect attention from internal challenges and crises, with the
latest comments arising after reports of attacks on the Ethiopian regime by the
opposition.
It
goes without saying that Desalegn’s comments merit mention; conflict and
potential war carry massive consequences for all involved, and simply, a region
with a long history of war (and with an array of current socio-political,
economic, and environmental challenges) really cannot afford another. Yet, the
comments also merit interest due to the manner in which they have been reported
and discussed. Almost without fail, various analysts, think-tankers, and media
outlets have accepted Desalegn’s claims about Eritrea’s destabilization efforts
uncritically. This point reflects the sorry state of reporting and analysis on
Eritrea and the Horn of Africa.
Orwell’s
Nineteen Eighty-Four describes “doublethink” – the act of holding,
simultaneously, two opposite, individually exclusive ideas or opinions and
believing in both simultaneously and absolutely. Likewise, during his visit to
the Oxford Union in the 1960s, Malcolm X exposed how “the powers that be use
the press to give the devil an angelic image and give the image of the devil to
the one who’s really angelic…[or] they’ll take a person who is a victim of the
crime and make it appear he’s the criminal, and they’ll take the criminal and
make it appear that he’s the victim of the crime.”
Are
there really no journalists, experts, or analysts that recognize the sheer irony
of Desalegn’s claims about destabilization? You don’t have to be a “regime
loyalist” to see how Desalegn’s comments about regional destabilization, coming
while his country illegally occupies (and repeatedly attacks) Eritrea is
hypocrisy of the highest order. Furthermore, in just the past several months,
Ethiopia has repeatedly and illegally made military incursions into Kenya,
while it has a long, bloody history of intervention and occupation in Somalia. A
la the 18th century French diplomat Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, not only was Ethiopia’s intervention into Somalia
a crime, but it was a monumental blunder. Rather than stemming terror (the professed
mission), it actually served to send terror and carnage cascading across the
region. So who is destabilizing the region, again?
Like
Chomsky’s “it’s only terror when they do it,” Ethiopia (on behalf of the West)
is incapable of destabilizing others. Empire’s media, experts, think-tankers,
and analysts don’t care about truth, rationality, context, or critical
questions. Instead, part of Empire’s strategy is psychological and ideological propagandizing. For
Empire, “the human being has his most critical point in his mind. Once his mind
has been reached, the political animal has been defeated, without necessarily
receiving bullets.” That is why Empire’s corporate media outlets churn out
sensationalism and feed us mindless drivel, not context, truth, or rational
analysis. If you’re not careful, war becomes peace, freedom becomes slavery,
ignorance becomes strength, and wolves become sheep. Stay woke!
Sponsored Ads
Post Comment